🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.